Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1939No. Civ. 6021PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to issue a peremptory writ of mandate whereby it sought to compel the respondents to recognize petitioner as the holder of the position of investigator in the California Highway Patrol, and to permit him to perform the duties as such investigator.

On December 20, 1934, when the civil service constitutional amendment (art. XXIV) became effective petitioner was “blanketed in” subject to the eight months probationary period required by the Personnel Board. On August 19, 1935, petitioner was served with notice from the chief of the department…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Neuwald v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Miller v. KaseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Wiles v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API