Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Hurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1964No. Civ. 27182; Civ. 27460PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

In this proceeding we are concerned with three appeals. In appeal number 27182, Paul Hurst has appealed from the order granting a final judgment of divorce nunc pro tunc as of August 21, 1957, and from said final judgment of divorce. In appeal number 27460, Paul Hurst, defendant in that action below, has appealed from a judgment determining him to be the father of one Paul Mark Hurst, decreeing that said Paul Mark Hurst is his legitimate son; ordering him to support said child and awarding attorney’s fees to the child’s counsel. Plaintiff, Paul Mark Hurst, by his guardian ad litem, has…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. In Re Richard M.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Shannon v. Northern Counties Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API