Legal Opinion

MacEdo v. MacEdo

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1938No. Civ. No. 5963PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 Cal.App.2d 387 (1938)

AUGUST MACEDO, Appellant,

v.

MARY MACEDO, Respondent.

Civ. No. 5963.

California Court of Appeals. Third Appellate District.

November 22, 1938.

Kenneth I. Jones for Appellant.

Howe, Hibbitt & Johnston and O. F. Meldon for Respondent.

Pullen, P. J.

These parties were married in February, 1932, and lived together until 1936, when they separated. Appellant herein, as plaintiff, then brought an action to annul the marriage upon the ground that at the time of marriage Mary Macedo had a husband then living.

It was true that at the date of the marriage between the parties hereto a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Corbett v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. In re Estate of WixomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Macedo v. MacedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Hurst v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Adoption of GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API