Legal Opinion

Fort Morgan Land & Canal Co. v. South Platte Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1892PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Weld County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hayt

This is a statutory proceeding instituted for the purpose of procuring an adjudication of priorities of right to the use of water for irrigation, in Water District No. 1 in Weld county. The petition was filed in the month of November, 1886, by The Platte & Beaver Improvement Company.

Upon this petition at the regular November term, 1886, of the district court of Weld county, an order was made appointing one C. A. Bennett referee. By this order the referee was directed to hear and determine such priorities in accordance with the statute regulating the procedure in such cases. Gen. Laws, 1883,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Larimer County Reservoir Co. v. People ex rel. LutheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. Farmers Independent Ditch Co. v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Walsh v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API