Legal Opinion

Vanyo v. Clear Channel Worldwide

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2004No. 82955PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy E. McMonagle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Clear Channel Worldwide, Dana Schulte, and Dennis Brockman, appeal from the order of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court that denied their motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration on a multicount complaint filed by plaintiff-appellejs, Aimee J. Vanyo. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} The record reflects that plaintiff-appellee, Aimee J. Vanyo (“Vanyo”), was employed as a radio personality for defendant, 102.5 FM ZOO (the “radio station”), from July 1999 until her discharge in August 2001. The radio…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Council of Smaller Enterprises v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Caskey v. Sanford-Brown CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Shumaker v. Saks, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Olah v. Ganley Chevrolet, Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-16-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Arnold v. Burger KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API