Legal Opinion

Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1938No. 26877. Department TwoPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The plaintiffs, respondents here, brought this action against Cascade Laundry Company to recover damages with respect to injuries suffered by themselves, their automobile, and its contents in a collision with the defendant’s delivery truck at the intersection of Apple way and Dearborn street, a few hundred feet east of the city limits of Spokane. The case was tried by jury. At the close of its case, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, later for a directed verdict, and, after the jury had returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of eleven hundred dollars, moved for judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Strouse v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stokoe v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Day v. PolleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Griffis v. SmarchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Shockey v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API