Legal Opinion
Morris v. Thogmartin
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1973No. Civ. 1614PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
The respondent, James Raymond Morris, recovered a judgment for personal injuries in the sum of $9,223.43 against the appellants, Dale Thogmartin and Wanda Thogmartin doing business as Dale’s Superette. The trial was before the judge sitting without a jury. Appellants contend that (1) the findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) the trial court committed reversible error in refusing appellants’ requést for specific findings.
We have concluded that the evidence supports the findings and judgment, but the cause must be remanded for the limited…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of DittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Placentia Fire Fighters v. City of PlacentiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Calistoga Civic Club v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Employers Casualty Co. v. Northern National Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.