Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1929No. Docket Nos. 3666, 3667PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

By stipulation the above two cases were tried together, the evidence offered and proceedings had in said trial applying to each of them, except the evidence as to the measure of damages.

These actions were brought by appellant, Geneva Carroll, for injuries sustained by her, and by R. P. Carroll, for the death of his daughter Belva Carroll, as they allege in their complaints, when the automobile in which the two women were riding as guests ran off of a bridge and fell upon a gas-pipe owned and operated by respondent, causing the pipe to crack or break and the gas flowing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Benwell v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Lacy v. Pacific Gas Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Odd Karlsen, Ball Sign Co. v. JackNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Miller v. Midway Fishing Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API