Legal Opinion
Konigsberg v. BD. OF ALDERMEN OF NEW HAVEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 14, 2007No. 17841, 17842PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The present controversy is comprised of two separate zoning appeals brought by the plaintiffs, seven individuals who own residential property in the city of New Haven (city), against the defendants, various city agencies and officials, seeking to prevent the construction of a new school in the East Rock neighborhood of the city. The plaintiffs’ first appeal (Docket No. SC 17841) concerns the decision of the city’s board of aldermen (board of aldermen) approving amendments to the zoning ordinance and the zoning map of the city, submitted by the New Haven city plan department…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Alexandre v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Garcia v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.