Legal Opinion
State v. Large
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 2000No. C8-99-566PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
A jury acquitted appellant James Edward Large on three of four counts of criminal sexual conduct and deadlocked on the fourth count relating to “multiple acts” of criminal sexual conduct. We must decide whether the state may appeal the trial court’s dismissal of the fourth count. The court of appeals held that the case was dismissed solely on a question of law and that dismissal would constitute a constitutional impediment to reissuance of the complaint. Therefore, the court of appeals held that the state’s appeal was proper. We reverse.
In 1998, James Edward Large was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. Martinez-MendozaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. PassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. SahrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.