Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez-Mendoza

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 2011No. A09-2151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

PAGE, Justice.

On August 24, 2009, appellant Victor Martinez-Mendoza was charged by complaint with one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct [count one] in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.842, subds. 1(a) and 2(a) (2010), and one count of second-degree criminal sexual conduct [count two] in violation of MinmStat. § 609.343, subds. 1(a) and 2(a) (2010), for the sexual abuse of his girlfriend’s daughter, A.K.D. The State and Martinez-Mendoza subsequently reached a plea agreement calling for Martinez-Mendoza to plead guilty to count two of the complaint; receive the presumptive…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee NodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State v. MonterminiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API