Legal Opinion
State v. Sahr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2012No. A10-0074PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In May 2008, respondent State of Minnesota charged then 29-year-old appellant Michael William Sahr with first-degree criminal sexual conduct, in violation of Minn-Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (2010) (prohibiting a defendant from engaging in “sexual contact with a person under 13 years of age”1 when the defendant is more than 36 months older than the person), arising out of conduct involving his then 8-year-old niece. The complaint alleged that-Sahr had sexually assaulted his niece by touching and rubbing her bare vaginal area. After the jury was impaneled and sworn,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. LargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. PassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Danna Rochelle Back v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Danna Rochelle Back v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.