Legal Opinion

Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 2014No. A10-2145PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

At issue in this case is the legality of a district court’s extension for up to 50 years of an order for protection (“OFP”) in favor of a victim of domestic abuse and her minor children. Over the objections of appellant James Allen Bergstrom, the district court granted an extension of an existing OFP to respondent Vanessa Yolanda Rew, Bergstrom’s ex-wife, prohibiting contact between Bergstrom and Rew or their minor children. Bergstrom raises a variety of statutory and constitutional challenges to the OFP. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand to the district…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API