Legal Opinion

Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Samowitz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 13, 1990No. 13833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

This appeal concerns the validity, under General Statutes § 47-33a and the common law rule against perpetuities, of an option to purchase real property contained in a long-term commercial lease. The named plaintiff, Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc.,1 brought an action for specific performance of an *678option contract against the defendants, Jack Samowitz, Alex Klein, Sheila Klein, Gloria Walkoff and Marilyn Moss, as successors in interest to the lessor of a lease executed and recorded in 1964. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed. We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Battalino v. Van PattenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Tolland Enterprises v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. HopperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API