Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Samowitz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This appeal concerns the validity, under General Statutes § 47-33a and the common law rule against perpetuities, of an option to purchase real property contained in a long-term commercial lease. The named plaintiff, Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc.,1 brought an action for specific performance of an *678option contract against the defendants, Jack Samowitz, Alex Klein, Sheila Klein, Gloria Walkoff and Marilyn Moss, as successors in interest to the lessor of a lease executed and recorded in 1964. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Battalino v. Van PattenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Tolland Enterprises v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. HopperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.