Legal Opinion
Nash v. Stevens
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 9, 2013No. AC 33958PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, Carol Ann Nash, appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, Betsey N. Stevens and Evelene N. Rabou.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment as a result of (1) its misapplication of General Statutes § 47-33a and (2) its failure to consider the intent of the parties in its analysis of § 47-33a. We are not persuaded, and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts were set forth in the court’s memorandum of decision…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Great Country Bank v. PastoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. DalzellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Niehaus v. Cowles Business Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doe v. Town of W. HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Anderson v. DikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Tomey Realty Co. v. Bozzuto's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- JMS Newberry, LLC v. Kaman Aerospace Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Abele Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Sono Stone & Gravel, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.