Legal Opinion
Battalino v. Van Patten
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 27, 2007No. AC 27426PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, Philip S. Van Patten, appeals from the judgment granting the plaintiff, Richard Battalino, the equitable remedy of specific performance of an option to buy land and ordering a conveyance of the land to the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the court improperly granted the equitable relief because (1) that relief is prohibited by General Statutes § 47-33a, (2) the underlying agreement violates General Statutes § 52-550 and (3) the court violated the parol evidence rule in interpreting the parties’ written agreement. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- H. J. Lewis Oyster Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Union Trust Co. v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- 307 White Street Realty, LLC v. Beaver Brook Group, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Battalino v. Van PattenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.