Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Hopper
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the rule against perpetuities applies to an option to purchase that is appendant to a commercial lease and exercisable during the term of the lease.
Rowena B. Hopper and Sparks M. Hopper (the Hoppers) filed a declaratory judgment proceeding against Citgo Petroleum Corporation (Citgo) and The Southland Corporation (Southland). The Hoppers, the lessors in a certain commercial lease, alleged that a provision in the lease that granted the lessee an option to purchase the leased property during the term of the lease violates the rule against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Ryland Group, Inc. v. WillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Quarto Mining Co. v. LitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Skeen v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- First Huntington National Bank v. Gideon-Broh Realty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. McManusMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
- Facile v. Assisted Living Homes, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2000
- Powell v. TrapassoMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996