Legal Opinion

Hamrick v. Loring

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1896No. 17,799PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court,

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellant was the trustee of the estate of Lawrence A. Nageleison by the voluntary assignment of the latter for the benefit of his creditors.

The appellees, William Loring and others, by original and amended petitions, sought, in the lower court, in which such assignment was pending, allowances against said estate, and, as to the proceeds of the sale of certain chattels, a preference as. against general creditors and as against the trustee for the services of himself and his attorneys in said trust. The preference was claimed to- arise in favor of the appellees and others by reason of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Forsythe v. KreuterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Grubbs v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. FertichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Citizens' Street Railroad v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Joseph v. WildIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Martin v. MarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API