Smith v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
— On affidavit and information, the appellant was convicted of perjury, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State’s prison.
It is first urged that the court erred in overruling the motion to quash the first count of the affidavit and information, under which the conviction was had. The reason given for this contention is that there is repugnancy between the affidavit and information, as to the date of the offense charged; and also that there is repugnancy in the allegations of the information itself.
The affidavit charges that the perjury was committed, at the trial of a certain cause in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Manley v. FeltyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Weakley v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Mankin v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.