Legal Opinion

Grubbs v. Morris

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1885No. 12,030PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The theory of the complaint of the appellants is that Francis M. Crull assigned to George B. Morris notes and accounts in trust, and that the purpose of the trust was to enable Morris to collect the notes and accounts and use the proceeds in paying the indebtedness of the assignor to the appellants and to Robertson and Perry. To the complaint the appellees addressed an answer containing, in substance, these allegations: That Francis M. Crull, being in failing circumstances, and not having sufficient property to pay his debts, made an assignment to George B. Morris of all his property and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Crowder v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Riggs v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lord v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Fisher v. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Gilbert v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API