Legal Opinion

Neyens v. Flesher

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1907No. 6,152PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Erom Jay Circuit Court; John F. LaFollette, Judge. Action by Leonard M. Neyens against Joe Flesher and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

In this cause appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, averring as reasons therefor: (1) That the appeal is premature, being upon an iterlocutory judgment for costs; (2) that the record in said cause does not exhibit a final judgment. The complaint was in two paragraphs. Demurrers were filed to the same and overruled, whereupon affirmative answers- were filed to each paragraph, to which answers appellant, plaintiff below, demurred, and upon submission the demurrers were carried back and sustained to the complaint. Appellant asked and obtained leave to amend, but afterwards…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Warren v. ShumanTexas Supreme Court · 1849

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fairwood Bluffs Conservancy District v. ImelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Enmeier v. BlaizeIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Northern Indiana & Southern Michigan Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Peoples Mutual Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ayrshire Coal Co. v. ThurmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Wehmeier v. Mercantile Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API