Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Fire & Police Pension Ass'n
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 18, 1988No. 86SC266PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, Justice.
Petitioners Patricia Peterson and Constance Preble commenced this declaratory judgment action against the Fire and Police Pension Association (Association), the Police Pension and Relief Board (Board), the City and County of Denver, and Mike Licht, Auditor, to obtain a judgment entitling them to survivor benefits under sections 31-30-1001 to -1016,12 C.R.S. (1985 Supp.) (state plan), and under section C5.42 of the Denver City Charter (1982) (city plan).1 Alternatively, they sought a declaration that the state plan is unconstitutional as applied to them, and as such, does not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Justus v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- McInerney v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Keelan v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.