Legal Opinion

Justus v. State

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2012No. 11CA1507PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge J. JONES.

11 Plaintiffs, Gary R. Justus, Kathleen Hopkins, Eugene Halaas, and Robert P. Laird, Jr., are recipients of retirement benefits through the Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA). They challenge sections 19 and 20 of Senate Bill 10-001 (now codified at §§ 24-51-1001, 24-51-1002, C.R.S8.2012), which reduced the amount they were entitled to receive as a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) to their PERA benefits. Specifically, they claim that this reduction violates their rights under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Colorado Constitutions and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Justus v. State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. WashingtonColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In the Interest of Delluomo v. CedarbladeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Mid Valley Real Estate Solutions V, LLC v. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API