Legal Opinion

Betts v. Board of Administration

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1978No. S.F. 23803PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

Petitioner, who served as Treasurer of the State of California from 1959 to 1967, seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent Board of Administration (Board) of the Public Employees’ Retirement System to compute his retirement benefit on the basis of the salary payable to the present Treasurer, rather than on the basis of the highest salary received by petitioner during his term of office. The principal issue involves the effect of 1974 amendments to the Legislators’ Retirement Law (Gov. Code, § 9350 et seq.) which replaced a “fluctuating” system of computing retirement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Wallace v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. McGrath v. Rhode Island Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API