McInerney v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'n
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge BRIGGS.
Plaintiff, Thomas J. Mclnerney, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against defendant, Public Employees’ Retirement Association (PERA). He contends that his right to procedural due process was violated as a result of statutory changes in the PERA benefit plan that were enacted without his knowledge. We affirm.
Plaintiff is a full-time, tenured professor at Metropolitan State College of Denver (Metro), who began working and contributing to PERA in 1982. In 1994, while he was on sabbatical, the General Assembly amended the PERA benefit scheme. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cendant Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Justus v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Masters v. School District No. 1 in the City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Masters v. School District No. 1 in the City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cendant Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.