Colorado Springs Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 5 v. City of Colorado Springs
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira
In this class action lawsuit the appellant, the City of Colorado Springs (City), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs/appellees. The trial court held that a 1966 city ordinance which provided that the City would pay the health insurance premiums for retired city employees created a vested quasi-pension type benefit. It also found that the two ordinances subsequently adopted by the city council, which limited the City’s premium contribution, were an unconstitutional impairment of the plaintiffs’ contractual rights in violation of article II, section…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re White Farm Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Police Pension & Relief Board v. McPhailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Heinsma v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Heinsma v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.