Legal Opinion
State v. Cates
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2015No. 89965-7PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
¶1 One of the community custody conditions imposed as part of Michael Shane Cates’ sentence provides that upon release from total confinement, he must consent to home visits to monitor his compliance with other community custody provisions. Cates argues this condition violates article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ holding that his challenge is not yet ripe for review.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Following a jury trial, Cates was convicted of two counts of first degree rape of a child and two counts of first degree child molestation. He was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Michael Christopher SheltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Tommie LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Wt Properties, Llc v. Leganieds, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Bsre Point Wells, Lp v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Alan John NordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.