Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Michael Christopher Shelton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 20, 2016No. 72848-2-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 — For the first time on appeal, Michael Shelton contends that as applied to an indigent defendant, the statute that requires imposition of a mandatory deoxy-ribonucleic acid (DNA) fee violates substantive due process. Shelton also challenges the requirement to obtain a mental health evaluation. Because the substantive due process challenge to the DNA fee statute is not ripe for review and is not manifest constitutional error under RAP 2.5(a)(3), we affirm imposition of the DNA fee but remand to determine whether the statutory requirements to order a mental health evaluation are met.

¶2 On…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Tommie LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Frederick Kenneth Hill, IiiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State Of Washington v. Abdirahman Mohamed IsmailCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. Abdullah Hassan EkriemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API