Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Tommie Lewis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 27, 2016No. 72637-4-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 — Tommie Bernard Lewis claims the mandatory deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fee statute violates equal protection. Lewis asserts there is no rational basis to require a repeat felony offender to pay the mandatory DNA fee. Lewis also claims the court abused its discretion in ordering him to submit another DNA sample. We hold the DNA fee statute that requires imposition of a fee for every felony sentence is rationally related to the legitimate legislative objective to fund the creation and ongoing operation and maintenance of the DNA database. We also conclude the court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Nicholas Windsor AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Aventis Pharmaceutical Inc, V Wa State Department Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Abdirahman Mohamed IsmailCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington v. Abdullah Hassan EkriemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. Hassen JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API