Wt Properties, Llc v. Leganieds, Llc
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 Where the dominant and servient estates of an easement vest in the same person, the merger doctrine generally extinguishes the easement. 1 But merger does not apply where the rights of innocent third persons would be prejudiced. 2
¶2 Here, the predecessors in interest to WT Properties LLC reserved an easement for ingress, egress, and utilities in certain property that the parties to this litigation refer to as the “Access Strip.” Thereafter, these same predecessors in interest granted a deed of trust to Viking Bank in the Access Strip and adjacent property. Later, these same predecessors in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert J. Conklin, V. Marcia BentzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021