Legal Opinion

State v. Valencia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2010No. 82731-1PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 — Petitioners Isidro Sanchez Valencia and Eduardo Chavez Sanchez were convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and conspiracy to commit that crime. At sentencing, as a condition of community custody, they were barred from using items that could be used to ingest or process controlled substances, or to facilitate the sale or transfer of controlled substances. On appeal, the petitioners challenged this condition as unconstitutionally vague. The Court of Appeals declined to entertain their challenge, concluding it was not ripe for review. We reverse the Court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. PadillaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. WallmullerWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Adrian Munoz RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. KinzleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Anthony G. HouckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API