Reclamation District No. 730 v. Inglin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action is in eminent domain, and the appeal is by the defendant from the judgment in condemnation entered upon the jury’s verdict.
The plaintiff is a reclamation district, entirely situated in Yolo County, organized as such under the laws of this state, the object for which it was organized being, as its name naturally implies, “to reclaim from overflow, flood, and seepage waters all the lands lying within the boundaries of said district. ’ ’
The defendant is the owner of a tract of land situated within the boundaries of said district, and it is alleged in the complaint that a certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- City of Santa Ana v. HarlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Los Angeles v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.