Legal Opinion
McCallum v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1985No. 12451PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the action of the defendant Avon inland wetlands commission (commission) in its denial of the plaintiff’s application to place “fill” for a driveway in the wetland on his property.
The record discloses that the plaintiff is the owner of property known as the Terrace Drive and Rexinger Lane subdivision in Avon. On or about March 4,1982, he applied to the commission for a permit1 which included a request to place thirty cubic yards of fill in the wetland on his property for a driveway crossing lot No. 10 of the subdivision. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Yorkdale Corp. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Thomas v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Arnold Bernhard & Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bartlett v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- McNally v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Murray v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.