Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1949PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This is a suit to recover on a contract of automobile collision insurance. The insurance company denied liability upon the ground that the policy relied upon had been cancelled. The cause was heard below on a stipulation of facts. Judgment was rendered in favor of the policy holder and against the insurance company and this appeal follows. The following, in substance, constitutes the basic facts of the stipulation on which judgment was rendered.

On or before June 30, 1943, the insurance company issued to Wallace a collision insurance policy on an automobile belonging to Wallace. From this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. MaguireIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Vanderbilt v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Leslie v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. McKenzieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Genone v. Citizens Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  5. Edwards v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API