Legal Opinion

Koehn v. Central National Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 5, 1960No. 41,886PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action to recover medical benefits under a policy of automobile liability insurance in which the insurance company defends on the ground that the policy was canceled.

The controlling question on appeal is whether actual receipt by the policyholder of the cancellation notice mailed by the insurer is a prerequisite to cancellation of the insurance under the so-called “standard cancellation clause” in the policy.

This so-called “standard form” of policy cancellation clause, insofar as material on this appeal, reads:

“. . . This…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Miller v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Henry Farber and Sam Levy, Third-Party v. Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co., of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Allen v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API