Legal Opinion
Medford v. Pacific National Fire Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
On 20 May 1946 the defendant insurance company issued a policy insuring the plaintiff against loss or damage to his automobile caused by collision. The plaintiff sues on the policy and alleges that on 8 November 1946 when the policy was in full force and effect his car was totally wrecked in an accident; that its reasonable value was $2100; that $700 is a reasonable attorney fee; that all conditions precedent have been performed and that payment has been demanded and refused.
The defendant denies the allegations to which we have referred and alleges that the plaintiff has not filed any proof…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Gould v. Dwelling-House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Westmoreland v. General Accident F. & L. Assurance CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.