Legal Opinion

McCamey v. Cummings

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — T. M. McConnell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The controversy in this case rests on chapter 34, Acts, of 1885, which reads as follows:

“An act to provide for the descent of the estates of' illegitimate persons who die intestate, leaving no relatives entitled to such estates under existing laws and to amend section 2423 of T. & S. Code.
“Section 1. Be it enacted hv the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, that the estates, both real and personal, of illegitimate persons dying intestate in this State leaving no relatives entitled by existing laws-to his or her estate, shall go to such persons as would, had the intestate been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Katz v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Cummings v. TrewhittTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State v. HaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cheatham County v. MurffTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. H. G. Hill Co. v. WhiticeTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. v. KizerTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API