Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1900PublishedCited by 68 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. F. H. IÍEISKELL, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The bill in this cause was brought in the name of the State of Tennessee, on the relation of W. B. Astor, against the Sehlitz Brewing Company, a foreign corporation with its situs in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Sigmund Boescher, its agent in Tennessee.

The complainant alleged as matter of fact, in substance, that the defendants, as principal and agent, had entered into, and for years had enforced, and were still enforcing, an arrangement, *721contract, agreement, trust, or combination with, the Tennessee Brewing Company, a domestic corporation, with its situs and principal place of business at…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API