Richardson v. Young
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. ■ — John Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields
E. R. Richardson, N. G. Robertson, and F. A. Raht, claiming to he the members of the state board of elections created by the general assembly by chapter 485, Acts 1907, and as citizens and taxpayers, bring this bill against S. M. Young, I. B. Tigrett, and James Maynard, who also claim to be members of the state board of elections by election and appointment under the provisions of chapter 103, Acts 1909, an act amending chapter 435, *484Acts 1907, for the purpose of asserting their title to the offices of members of the state hoard of elections, and their right to exercise the powers and duties,…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Woods v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.