Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from from the Chancery Court of ■ Jefferson. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The appellant, Henrietta A. Lindsay, opened negotiations with the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company, a building and loan corporation of St. Paul, Minnesota, for the purpose of securing a loan from said company, and on May 17th, 1890, the negotiations were completed, and Henrietta A. Lindsay subscribed for fifty shares of stock in said company and executed to it the following…
Read the full summary
Appeal from from the Chancery Court of ■ Jefferson. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The appellant, Henrietta A. Lindsay, opened negotiations with the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company, a building and loan corporation of St. Paul, Minnesota, for the purpose of securing a loan from said company, and on May 17th, 1890, the negotiations were completed, and Henrietta A. Lindsay subscribed for fifty shares of stock in said company and executed to it the following note : “St. Paul, Minn., May 27, 1890. $2,500.00. For value received, after three years from date and before nine years…
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
The bill was filed by the appellant to be let ixx to redeem real estate she had by mortgage conveyed to the appellee, a cox-poration.organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, having therein its domicile or principal place of business, and to enjoin the appellee from the exercise of a power of sale contained in the mortgage. The transactions involved, in all their legal aspects, are identical with the transactions which were the subject of extended discus*165sion, deliberate consideration, and reconsideration in the case of Falls v. U. S. Savings, Loan & Building Co., 97…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Meroney v. Atlanta Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Sisters of Visitation v. COCHRAN PLASTERING CO. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State ex rel. Crumpton v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.