Legal Opinion

Cheatham County v. Murff

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-khen

The hill filed in this cause challenged the constitutionality of chapter 442 of the Private Acts of 1939. The chancellor held the Act to he valid and the complainants have appealed.

The most serious charge made against the Act is that it violates that portion of Section 17 of Article 2 of the Constitution providing that “All acts which repeal, revive or amend former laws, shall recite in their caption or otherwise, the title or substance of the law repealed, revived or amended.”

The scope of the Act involved is fairly indicated by its caption. The Act is lengthy, containing twenty-five…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hancock v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hicks v. Rhea CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brown v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API