Legal Opinion

American Falls Reservoir District v. Thrall

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the instant proceeding, respondent, American Falls Reservoir District, by its board of directors, filed its petition in the district court for Twin Falls county, Idaho, and among other things alleges that it is a duly organized irrigation district under the laws of the state of Idaho; that its organization as an irrigation district, the election of its first board of directors and the organization of the members of said board, as a board of directors, has been confirmed by a decree of the court, entered therein March 24, 1923; that this proceeding is in the name of reopening that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  3. Pioneer Irrigation District v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cosman v. Chestnut Valley Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Noble v. Yancey.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kerner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API