Legal Opinion

East St. Louis v. Amy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1887PublishedCited by 56 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Mandamus to enforce the collection of a tax upon a municipal corporation,. Judgment for the relator. The corporation sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

delivered'the opinion, of the court.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to require the mayor and council,of the city of East St. Louis to levy a tax to pay ' a judgment against the city for $36,495.28 rendered by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois, in favor of H. Amy & Co. on the 22d of August, 1885.-The facts are.as follows:

By the charter of the city, which went into effect March 26, 1869,. the city council was given authority to borrow money on the credit of the city to an amount not exceeding $100,000, and to issue bonds therefor, but the power of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. East St. Louis & Treasurer of East St. Louis v. United States Ex Rel. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Matter of Coombs v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Sanders v. Merchants State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API