Legal Opinion
United States v. Aho
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 15, 1944No. Civil Action 1337PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
This is an action for condemnation of certain real property embraced within the limits of the Beaver Drainage District. The United States has specified in the amended complaint that the interest taken is the fee simple title. There are set out in the answer to the amended complaint, to which a demurrer has been filed, allegations regarding the function of the District and its operations which are claimed to show a compensable interest owned by the District in the parcel taken. An outline of such statements follows.
The defendant, Beaver Drainage District, is a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
- Thibodo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.