Texaco, Inc. v. Rogow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The plaintiff, Texaco, Inc., sought specific performance of a contract to sell certain premises leased to it by the defendant. It claimed to have exercised, at a price of $16,000, an option to purchase which was contained in the lease. The defendant, in his answer and counterclaim, denied that the plaintiff had any right to exercise any option at $16,000, alleged that the plaintiff had in fact exercised an option to purchase the premises for $44,000, and sought, by way of counterclaim, specific performance of the plaintiff’s alleged agreement to purchase the property at the latter figure.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Connecticut Co. v. DIVISION 425Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Butler v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
- Shell Oil Co. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Heyman v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Texaco, Inc. v. CreelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Lanna v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Smith v. Hevro Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bobali Corp. v. Tamapa Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.