Texaco, Inc. v. Creel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
This is an action for specific performance of a fixed price option provision in a lease. The determinative issue is whether plaintiff, as defendants’ lessee, is entitled to specific performance. We conclude plaintiff is so entitled and affirm the Court of Appeals.
On 9 September 1949, the Texaco Company, plaintiffs predecessor in interest, leased from Thomas and Inez Pendergraft, defendants’ predecessors in interest, a lot located next to Fowler’s Food Store in Chapel Hill. The lease was to begin on 1 February 1950 and run for ten years with the lessee given the option to extend…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Dull v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Marshburn v. AssociatEd Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.