Legal Opinion

Texaco, Inc. v. Creel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1984No. 381PA82PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This is an action for specific performance of a fixed price option provision in a lease. The determinative issue is whether plaintiff, as defendants’ lessee, is entitled to specific performance. We conclude plaintiff is so entitled and affirm the Court of Appeals.

On 9 September 1949, the Texaco Company, plaintiffs predecessor in interest, leased from Thomas and Inez Pendergraft, defendants’ predecessors in interest, a lot located next to Fowler’s Food Store in Chapel Hill. The lease was to begin on 1 February 1950 and run for ten years with the lessee given the option to extend…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Dull v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Marshburn v. AssociatEd Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API