Legal Opinion
Queensbury Union Free School District v. Jim Walter Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Raymond Amyot, J.
In 1966 the plaintiff, Queensbury Union Free School District, by written contract, engaged the defendant, Crandell Associates, Architects, "to perform architectural services with regard to the planning and construction” of an elementary school building.
The standard American Institute of Architects (AIA) printed form contract by which the architects were employed provided that they agreed "to provide professional services.” The resolution of the board of education which authorized employment of the architects recites that the services to be performed by the architects include preparation of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Kirby v. Rouselle Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Barnett v. City of YonkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Nickel v. Hyster Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Risk Management Division of Department of Finance & Administration v. Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.