Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Rouselle Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Robert H. Wagner, J.

The defendant, Paul Abell, doing business as Abell Machine Tool Company (Abell) moves for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212.

On August 25,1977 while operating a Rouselle Model 2, 15-ton, Inclinable Punch Press as an employee of Brainerd Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Brainerd), plaintiff, Cynthia Kirby, sustained personal injuries when her hand was caught between the press dies.

The following facts are undisputed. Abell was a manufacturer’s representative or distributor of heavy machinery, including punch presses…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Biss v. Tenneco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Velez v. Craine & Clark Lumber Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Benitez-Allende v. Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Assam v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  5. Brumbaugh v. CEJJ, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API