Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'n
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1976PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Breitel.
In consolidated arbitration proceedings under CPLR 7503 (subds [a], [b]), petitioner architects *672appeal. The building owner demanded arbitration under building construction agreements against the architects and the contractor. In the first proceeding the architects sought a stay and the owner, in the other proceeding, sought to compel arbitration and to consolidate the separate proceedings. Supreme Court consolidated the proceedings and directed the parties to arbitrate. The Appellate Division affirmed, two Justices dissenting. Only the architects appeal.
The issue is…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hulbert v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gertler v. GoodgoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.