Legal Opinion
Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1975PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
These three cases arise out of claims asserted against the manufacturer of allegedly defective products by remote users; the theory of liability is that which we have called strict products liability (Codling v Paglia, 32 NY2d 330). We now hold that the period of limitation with respect to these claims begins to run at the date of injury and that the duration of such period is that found in CPLR 214 (subds 4, 5) *400under which there is a limitation of three years in actions for personal injury and property damage. (See 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 214.13, 214.14, 214.15.)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.